---
Receive livebetter eMagazine for free


Center for a Better Life: One Earth. One Family. Live Better. Be Part of It.

HOME

ABOUT US

livebetter
eMAGAZINE

 
No. 31, May 2013
 
No. 30, Apr 2013
 
No. 29, Mar 2013
 
No. 28, Feb 2013
 
No. 27, Jan 2013
 
No. 26, Nov 2012
 
2012 BACK ISSUES
 
2007-2011 BACK ISSUES
 
2013 MEDIA KIT

TOP livebetter
ARTICLES


NEWS, STUDIES
& REPORTS


PRODUCTS &
SERVICES


CONFERENCES

 

CH2M HILL, Global Leader in Sustainable Strategy, Design and Delivery; Practical strategies for adapting to change.
Unlocking Value through Innovation & Creative Solutions<br />
			Carbon-Key, LLC www.carbon-key.com
The log with an R-20 insulation value.

InsuLog by Kuhns Bros Log Homes Inc.

www.kuhnsbros.com
CRI Get Adobe Flash player
Building Hope for Humanity : 25,000 Members in 111 Posts through the US and in 14 Countries. — SAME – Society of American Military Engineers — Be a leader. Make a difference. Join SAME today. www.same.org
HDR
Printer Friendly Article

environment

Honey Bee Health & Food Security

By Irene L.G. Newton, PhD, Assistant Professor of Biology, Indiana University-Bloomington
---

© iStockphoto.com/njmcc


The honey bee is, arguably, the most famous insect on the planet. It has been associated with human populations for thousands of years and is a model for cooperation, collaboration and interaction within a complex society. Honey bees are eusocial insects: A single queen bee generates a colony of tens of thousands of daughters who work together to promote the health, stability and maintenance of the colony. These workers sacrifice their own reproduction and spend their days caring for their developing sisters, constructing honey comb, making and storing their own food (honey and bee bread), and communicating with one another about their local environment (through waggle dancing and chemical cues).

Fame aside, honey bees are the most economically important pollinators on Earth. Because they have wide-ranging tastes for pollen and nectar, and visit a large diversity of flowers, they increase the value of crops in the U.S. by $20 billion per year [1]. In fact, pollination by insects produces one out of every three mouthfuls of food consumed globally [2] – a staggering statistic. This impressive number suggests that the health of our pollinators is closely tied to the security of the world’s food supply.

Given the importance of pollinators, both monetarily and agriculturally, colony losses in recent years are particularly alarming. The syndrome termed “Colony Collapse Disorder” (CCD) first received national attention in the late 2000s. Honey bee keepers reported losing between 20 to 60 percent of their hives to CCD [3]. Bee keepers identify hives suffering from CCD because the worker populations are completely lost. They abandon the queen and the brood, never to be seen again. The cause of this mysterious syndrome has yet to be determined.

Although no single agent has been identified as directly causing CCD, the disorder seems to be correlated with multiple stresses on honey bees. These stresses include: pesticide use, agricultural practices (including transportation of hives around the country and antibiotic use), malnutrition, parasites and pathogens (such as the Varroa mite, Nosema and Israeli acute paralysis virus). Clearly, more research is needed to better understand what makes a honey bee colony susceptible to disease and to the syndrome. Conversely, if people can better understand what makes a healthy colony, they may be able to protect their hives from these stresses.

At the center of a healthy honey bee colony is the queen bee, which is responsible for all reproduction and generation of new hive members. Her highness lays more than one thousand eggs per day – an impressive number of offspring. The workers she lays are the result of mating during her first

---

Photo Courtesy of Irene L.G. Newton

five days of life in what is termed her “nuptial flight.” A queen is expected to mate with between 10 to 20 male drone bees during that flight and will store all the sperm she needs to maintain her colony for the rest of her life. This mating strategy (the promiscuous behavior of the honey bee queen) is rare among eusocial insects [4]. Most queens mate with a single male and produce colonies whose close genetic relatedness is thought to foster cooperation [5].

This argument is based on the concept of kin selection – that organisms are more likely to care for and promote reproduction of close relatives compared to distant or unrelated conspecifics. Add to this phenomenon the genetic quirk of the honey bee – that males contain half the genetic material of females – and this means that honey bees with the same drone father will be highly related to each other (on average, 75 percent). For comparison, consider that a person and his/her full siblings would be, on average, 50 percent related. That means a honey bee worker is more related to her sister than she would be to her own offspring – the argument of kin selection seems to make sense.

However, this argument is turned on its head when one considers that the natural state is for the queen to mate with many different drones, creating a genetically diverse colony where worker honey bees with different fathers are 25 percent related to each other. The greater number of drones contributing to the colony, the more genetic diversity found within the colony. Given that genetic relatedness is thought to foster collaboration, why is the honey bee queen promiscuous? Researchers have been investigating the effects of genetic diversity in honey bees for many years and results unambiguously point to genetic diversity improving health and function of honey bee colonies [6-11].

At this point it is worth emphasizing that honey bees are an agricultural crop; they are not natural to North America and are heavily managed. When bee keepers order queens for the season from apiaries, these queens are, for the most part, artificially inseminated with drone sperm. The quality, quantity and diversity of the sperm used in the mating is, therefore, entirely under control of the queen breeder. In the past, commercially purchased queens in the U.S. have been found lacking [12]. These queens were found to harbor a low quantity of sperm from a few drones – an alarming result. Recently, however, it seems that insemination practices are producing quality queens [13], perhaps because of the attention paid to this issue of colony genetic diversity.

Another complicating factor is that honey bees have been genetically selected for particular traits: disease resistance, mite tolerance, honey production, etc. Each of these selected strains of honey bee is a diversity bottleneck, a reduction in the pool of genetic material available to bee keepers and queen breeders. We do not fully understand what this decrease in genetic diversity means for colony health, but it cannot be positive. Inbreeding is known to increase the susceptibility of an entire population to disease, thus decreasing the ability of that population to withstand pathogen attacks and increasing the possibility of genetic disorders within a strain [14].

Many researchers are currently interested in the natural microbes associated with honey bees and what they may mean for honey bee health. This is because bacteria are everywhere, and the vast majority are not harmful; in fact, they are likely beneficial. For example, the community of microbes that

---

© iStockphoto.com/Irochka_T

exists on and within human bodies outnumbers (by count) its own cells. This community, called “the human microbiome,” has co-evolved with people for millions of years [15] and is involved in helping them digest food [16,17], in protecting them from disease [18-20], in training their immune system [17] and can be used to prevent [18,21] and to treat disease (e.g., [22,23]). The popularity and efficacy of probiotics is a testament to the beneficial role these organisms play in human physiology. But what role might bacteria play in honey bee health and vitality?

Just like those found on human bodies, bacteria associated with honey bees may be helping them to acquire nutrients from their food and to protect them from disease. For instance, middle-aged workers (so called “food processors”) manipulate pollen that older foragers collect into a food product called “bee bread” by essentially regurgitating into pollen before storing it in comb. This mixture is allowed to mature for weeks before being consumed by the bees. It is as though the bees “know” that microbial processing of this important food is necessary as honey bees fed bee bread live longer than those fed raw pollen [24].

It is presumed that the metabolic activity of microorganisms found in bee bread (but absent in unprocessed pollen) are responsible for transforming it into a more nutritious and storable food product [25-28] by increasing its vitamin content [29], lowering its levels of indigestible polysaccharides and decreasing its pH [25,30]. Bee bread provides almost all essential nutrients to honey bees (e.g., protein, lipids, vitamins and minerals), and colonies cannot survive without it. However, the means by which microorganisms generate these changes and which ones are predominantly involved in this metabolic transformation had never been determined before.

Recently, the role of within-colony genetic diversity in shaping the microbiome of the honey bee was investigated [31]. Of particular interest to bee researchers and bee keepers are microbial differences between colonies generated by promiscuous queens (mated with many drones) and those by chaste ones (mated with a single drone). In this study, two kinds of colonies were compared with regards to the kinds of bacteria actively metabolizing within: genetically diverse colonies (the offspring of promiscuous queens) and genetically uniform colonies (the offspring of single matings). A total of 12 diverse colonies were compared to 10 uniform colonies and samples were taken from bee guts, whole bees and the important food product bee bread.

These samples were subjected to a relatively new molecular technique that allows researchers to identify the bacteria associated with those samples. The study results are based on a total of 70,562 sequences from bacteria within those colonies and, as such, is the first study to so deeply sample the bacterial communities associated with honey bees. Interestingly, bacteria associated with honey bees and bee bread were similar to bacteria known from other “fermentation environments,” such as wine, cow rumens and yogurt. This result suggests that these bacteria may be helping bees process the complex polysaccharides found in plant materials and, perhaps, also to provide missing nutrients [31]. This work also identified a possible probiotic organism in honey bee colonies.

---

Photo Courtesy of Irene L.G. Newton

Colonies that had higher loads of a particular bacterium (Bifidobacterium) tended to have lower numbers of pathogenic bacteria. This association proved to be significant – only colonies with a low number of Bifidobacterium related microbes were infected with Melissococcus, a known bee pathogen. This result suggests that, if cultivated, Bifidobacterium species from honey bees could serve as a probiotic for the colonies, thus protecting them from disease. Finally, this study also investigated the difference between genetically diverse and genetically uniform colonies, with regards to their resident bacteria, with interesting results.

First, colonies that were genetically diverse were host to more diverse bacteria; a greater diversity and number of bacterial species were found when queens were promiscuous. Second, promiscuous queens produced colonies with a greater number of probiotic microbes and a reduced number of pathogens. This last result is quite interesting as it suggests that the quality and quantity of bacterial species present in the honey bee colony may depend on the mating quality of the queen. Researchers do not yet understand how the microbiome is assembled in the context of a social environment. Is it the case that each honey bee brings to the colony its own special mix of associated bacteria, or is there some other emergent property of the honey bee society that alters the composition of the microbiome in fundamental ways?

Fundamentally, by building an understanding of the honey bee microbiome researchers may find out how microbial metabolism might contribute to honey bee nutrition (Are these microorganisms fermenting pollen in bee bread, and what is the result for the honey bee?), whether microbes provide protective benefits to colonies (such as Bifidobacterium’s protective advantage) and whether these benefits are enhanced when colonies are genetically diverse. Importantly, these kinds of studies suggest that current colony management practices may be harming the natural state of the honey bee microbiome in ways currently not appreciated.

The prophylactic treatment of honey bees with oxytetracycline may reduce the number of beneficial microbes in a colony with wide-ranging consequences. For example, a reduction in the bacteria associated with the bees would likely affect the ability of these microbes to process bee bread and to protect the hive from disease. Decreasing the genetic diversity within a honey bee colony can clearly have negative impacts with regards to the microbes associated. So it is important for bee keepers to know the quality of mating of their queens. Thinking holistically about CCD and honey bee health, bee researchers and microbiologists are working hard to understand the natural microbial state for the honey bee, as generating a healthier colony will necessarily mean they are less likely to succumb to disease.---Issue No. 21, 2012


---

© iStockphoto.com/bo1982



Irene Newton earned her PhD from Harvard University in 2008 focusing her research on the symbioses between marine invertebrates (such as giant clams and tubeworms) and bacteria. Those hosts thrive at the bottom of the ocean on the metabolic power of their bacterial symbionts. Since then she has shifted her interest and work to insect-associated bacteria, including the reproductive parasite Wolbachia (whose claim to fame is its ubiquity in the insect world and its use to control Dengue transmission) as well as honey bees and their microbiota. Newton was a National Science Foundation Postdoctoral Fellow at Tufts University under Ralph Isberg and is currently a faculty member of the Biology Department at Indiana University-Bloomington. Her lab is an environmental microbiology research group that applies high-throughput bioinformatic and genomic tools to the study of bacterial ecology and evolution. They work to understand the molecular basis of interactions between bacteria and eukaryotes and, ultimately, how these relationships impact bacterial diversity, population structure and genomic evolution.


Bibliography:
  1. Morse R, Calderone N (2000) The value of honey bees as pollinators of U.S. crops in 2000. Bee Culture. Medina, OH: AI Root Company.
  2. Klein AM, Vaissiere BE, Cane JH, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, et al. (2007) Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 274: 303-313.
  3. vanEngelsdorp D, Hayes J, Underwood RM, Caron D, Pettis J (2011) A survey of managed honey bee colony losses in the USA, fall 2009 to winter 2010. Journal of Apicultural Research 50: 1-10.
  4. Strassmann J (2001) The rarity of multiple mating by females in the social Hymenoptera. Insectes Sociaux 48: 1-13.
  5. Hughes WOH, Oldroyd BP, Beekman M, Ratnieks FLW (2008) Ancestral monogamy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of eusociality. Science 320: 1213-1216.
  6. Mattila HR, Seeley TD (2007) Genetic diversity in honey bee colonies enhances productivity and fitness. Science 317: 362-364.
  7. Palmer KA, Oldroyd BP (2003) Evidence for intra-colonial genetic variance in resistance to American foulbrood of honey bees (Apis mellifera): further support for the parasite/pathogen hypothesis for the evolution of polyandry. Naturwissenschaften 90: 265-268.
  8. Seeley TD, Tarpy DR (2007) Queen promiscuity lowers disease within honeybee colonies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 274: 67-72.
  9. Tarpy DR, Seeley TD (2006) Lower disease infections in honeybee (Apis mellifera) colonies headed by polyandrous vs monandrous queens. Naturwissenschaften 93: 195-199.
  10. Oldroyd BP, Rinderer TE, Harbo JR, Buco SM (1992) Effects of Intracolonial Genetic Diversity on Honey-Bee (Hymenoptera, Apidae) Colony Performance. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 85: 335-343.
  11. Jones JC, Myerscough MR, Graham S, Oldroyd BP (2004) Honey bee nest thermoregulation: Diversity promotes stability. Science 305: 402-404.
  12. Camazine S, Cakmak I, Cramp K, Finley J, Fisher J, et al. (1998) How healthy are commercially-produced US honey bee queens? American Bee Journal 138: 677-680.
  13. Tarpy DR, Keller JJ, Caren JR, Delaney DA (2012) Assessing the Mating ‘Health’ of Commercial Honey Bee Queens. Journal of Economic Entomology 105: 20-25.
  14. Fox CW, Reed DH (2010) Inbreeding depression increases with maternal age in a seed-feeding beetle. Evolutionary Ecology Research 12: 961-972.
  15. Walter J, Ley R (2011) The human gut microbiome: ecology and recent evolutionary changes. Annu Rev Microbiol 65: 411-429.
  16. Sela DA, Chapman J, Adeuya A, Kim JH, Chen F, et al. (2008) The genome sequence of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis reveals adaptations for milk utilization within the infant microbiome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 18964-18969.
  17. Kau AL, Ahern PP, Griffin NW, Goodman AL, Gordon JI (2011) Human nutrition, the gut microbiome and the immune system. Nature 474: 327-336.
  18. Hsieh MH, Versalovic J (2008) The human microbiome and probiotics: implications for pediatrics. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 38: 309-327.
  19. Lampe JW (2008) The Human Microbiome Project: getting to the guts of the matter in cancer epidemiology. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17: 2523-2524.
  20. Power C, Antony JM, Ellestad KK, Deslauriers A, Bhat R, et al. (2010) The human microbiome in multiple sclerosis: pathogenic or protective constituents? Can J Neurol Sci 37 Suppl 2: S24-33.
  21. Preidis GA, Versalovic J (2009) Targeting the human microbiome with antibiotics, probiotics, and prebiotics: gastroenterology enters the metagenomics era. Gastroenterology 136: 2015-2031.
  22. Grehan MJ, Borody TJ, Leis SM, Campbell J, Mitchell H, et al. (2010) Durable alteration of the colonic microbiota by the administration of donor fecal flora. J Clin Gastroenterol 44: 551-561.
  23. Khoruts A, Dicksved J, Jansson JK, Sadowsky MJ (2010) Changes in the composition of the human fecal microbiome after bacteriotherapy for recurrent Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. J Clin Gastroenterol 44: 354-360.
  24. Beutler R, Opfinger E (1949) Pollenernährung und Nosemabefall der Honigbiene (Apis mellifica) [Pollen feeding and Nosema infection of the honey bee (Apis mellifica)]. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Physiologie 32: 383-421.
  25. Herbert E, Shimanuki H (1978) Chemical composition and nutritive value of bee-collected and bee-stored pollen. Apidologie 9: 33-40.
  26. Gilliam M (1979) Microbiology of Pollen and Bee Bread - the Yeasts. Apidologie 10: 43-53.
  27. Gilliam M (1979) Microbiology of Pollen and Bee Bread - Genus Bacillus. Apidologie 10: 269-274.
  28. Vasquez A, Olofsson TC (2009) The lactic acid bacteria involved in the production of bee pollen and bee bread. Journal of Apicultural Research 48: 189-195.
  29. Haydak M, Vivino A (1950) The changes in the thiamine, riboflavin, niacin, and pantothenic acid content in the food of female honeybees during growth with a note on the vitamin K activity of royal jelly and bee bread. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 43: 361-367.
  30. Loper G, Standifer L, Thompson M, Gilliam M (1980) Biochemistry and microbiology of bee-collected almond (Prunis dulcis) pollen and bee bread. I. Fatty-acids, sterols, vitamins and minerals. Apidologie 11: 63-73.
  31. Mattila HR, Rios D, Walker-Sperling V, Roeselers G, Newton I (2012) Characterization of the active microbiotas associated with honey bees reveals healthier and broader communities when colonies are genetically diverse. PLoS One in revision.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn



Receive livebetter eMagazine; it’s free. One Earth. One Family. Live Better. Be Part of It.

 
Home   |   About Us   |   Supporter Info   |   Privacy Policy   |   Site Map   |   Advertise English  |  Español  |  Deutsch


Background image by Miguel Ángel de la Cueva. To purchase a print or for more information, visit Cueva’s Facebook page.


©2013 Forest Partners, LLC • 2402 Independence Rd., Independence, WV 26374 • rcalvert@centerforabetterlife.com